The Crimes of Israel’s Government During the Recent Wars and Occupation

A fact-based digest with sources (2018–2025)

thePR0M3TH3AN ✝️

22. September 2025September 22, 2025 · 15 Min. Lesezeit15 min read · Aktualisiert am 16. August 2026Updated August 16, 2026

A fact-based digest with sources (2018–2025)

Section 1 — Key allegations with supporting evidence#

1) Israel “funded Hamas via Qatar”#

Sponsored Adadzaps.net

2) Israel shot children and Palestinians seeking food from aid deliveries#

3) “Double-tap” strikes hitting rescuers/journalists#

4) “Bombing peace negotiations”#

Israel’s responses (for context)


Section 2 — Targeting of specific body parts#

Bottom line: There is strong evidence that Israeli forces aimed at lower limbs (knees/ankles) in 2018–19 Gaza border protests, framed by the IDF as “aim low” to incapacitate; credible first-person accounts describe a competitive, game-like ethos among some snipers. For 2025 aid-line shootings, some doctors reported head/genital wounds, now under review.

No credible outlet has verified a formalized “body-part-of-the-day” policy (e.g., “Mondays legs, Fridays arms”). Evidence supports persistent limb-targeting directives and boastful subculture, not a scheduled “game.”


Section 3 — Other concerning, well-evidenced patterns#


Section 4 — Information operations & disputed official narratives#


Notes on standards and dispute#


Legal yardstick. Under Article II of the 1948 Genocide Convention, genocide requires certain acts (e.g., killing, serious harm, or life-destroying conditions) committed with intent to destroy a protected group, in whole or in part. The specific intent element is decisive. (United Nations)

Current institutional findings (not a final court judgment):

Expected timeline (based on current dockets and past practice):

Bottom line for Section 5. As of September 21, 2025, one UN investigative body (the COI) says genocide has been committed; the ICJ recognizes a plausible genocide risk and has imposed binding interim measures but has not ruled on the merits; the ICC has non-genocide warrants outstanding for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. A definitive legal answer on genocide will turn on the ICJ’s merits judgment—likely a multi-year horizon—while ICC accountability depends on arrests. (OHCHR)


Conclusion (updated)#

Across Sections 1–5, the record shows substantial, well-sourced allegations regarding Israeli conduct (targeting practices, civilian harm, obstruction of aid, information operations) alongside the government’s denials and legal defenses. On genocide specifically, the issue remains legally unsettled: a UN COI has issued a genocide finding, the ICJ has ordered precautionary measures while it adjudicates the merits, and the ICC is pursuing war-crimes/crimes-against-humanity cases under active arrest warrants. As of September 21, 2025, the most authoritative, binding resolution—an ICJ merits judgment—is still pending, with a timeline measured in years, and any ICC trial is contingent on arrests. (OHCHR)

Additional Sources#


Adam Malin

adammalin.com

You can find me on Nostr at:

npub15jnttpymeytm80hatjqcvhhqhzrhx6gxp8pq0wn93rhnu8s9h9dsha32lx

You can view and write comments on this or any other post by using the Satcom browser extention.

value4value Did you find any value from this article? Click here to send me a tip!

#152:#302

Written by

Comments

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Contents

7 sections

  1. Section 1 — Key allegations with supporting evidence
  2. Section 2 — Targeting of specific body parts
  3. Section 3 — Other concerning, well-evidenced patterns
  4. Section 4 — Information operations & disputed official narratives
  5. Section 5 — Has Israel committed “genocide”? Where the legal process stands, and what comes next (as of September 21, 2025)
  6. Conclusion (updated)
  7. Additional Sources