Latest Strikes #24 - June 8th - 14th 2026

Fanis

20. Juni 2026June 20, 2026 · 4 Min. Lesezeit4 min read

Welcome to Latest Strikes, your weekly report of the latest Lightning-related news. Last week Bark was launched on mainnet, BitGo announced Lightning Earn, and a curious paper about Lightning Command & Control was published.

Lightning Earn#

BitGo announced the integration of Amboss Rails into their custody offering. BitGo institutional users can deploy liquidity into an Amboss-managed Lightning node, through the BitGo API and without renouncing the custody of their coins (for self-custodial users, at least). BitGo itself "has deployed 10 bitcoin from its own treasury into Lightning Earn" which as of today represents around 15% of the total deployed in the Rails Cluster.

This announcement further solidifies Lightning's potential as a counterparty risk-free yield instrument, notably for institutional investors.

Lightning Command & Control#

An interesting paper was published last week, proposing an evaluation framework and a test bed for the use of Lightning as Command & Control (C2) for botnets. When attackers want to leverage a botnet, they need to be able to pass instructions to the machines comprising the botnet. A traditional method is to use centralized C2 servers: machines in the botnet reach the server, get instructions and perform their (nefarious) tasks. However, an issue for attackers is that these centralized C2 servers tend to get shut down. They hence need to find ways to hide and decentralize command delivery — and one attractive option is to piggyback on payment-channel or blockchain systems that are hard to censor. For example, the Glupteba botnet famously used Bitcoin OP_RETURNs to let its machines learn new C2 server addresses if the hardcoded ones ever stopped responding.

Here, the explored idea is that the malware can run a Lightning node and receive commands through keysend payments. A notable advantage is that since payments are encrypted, the commands' content is hidden, and the mere fact that these payments act as a C2 mechanism is obfuscated. Previous work, cited in last week's paper, explored different topologies that attackers could adopt for the Lightning channels connecting their botnet. This new paper moves these approaches from simulations to a regtest network with varying numbers of nodes, and tests how different topologies behave in terms of propagation speed and resilience.

Of course, I think using Lightning channels as a C2 transport mechanism is a bit impractical, but as the network grows it could become a more interesting medium. It's also worth noting that while using payments to transfer messages is fairly private, using the gossip layer could (maybe?) achieve a comparable outcome without requiring machines in the botnet to open actual channels!

Bark#

Bark, Second's Ark implementation, went live on mainnet last week! On top of this announcement itself, two things that caught my eye are:

Quick Strikes#


That's it for today! Thank you so much for reading this far, and until next week!

https://stacker.news/items/1511938

Written by

Comments

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Contents

4 sections

  1. Lightning Earn
  2. Lightning Command & Control
  3. Bark
  4. Quick Strikes